Modern folks would say "less and less of us use "fewer," but that's wrong, not that you'd know it by listening to anyone else but me and a few of my foolish (or is that "few-less"?) friends. It annoys me to hear otherwise intelligent announcers on, say, NPR, saying "fewer" less and less, if at all. Every day, in fact, there is less use of few.
The difference, for those of you who are too young to remember or just don't or didn't care, is that "less" is for "amounts" of things and "fewer" is for numbers of things or people.
Here're the examples.
- There is less water in the short glass than in the tall glass.
- There are six people in the blue car and four in the red one. The red car has fewer people in it.
No one would say "please put fewer sugar into the pie," but no one seems to have a problem saying there are less people in that line than in this one.
That, I guess, is how language changes. It seems to become less precise and much less useful. (Intuitively, one does know that you wouldn't say "fewer precise.")
Is it just laziness on the part of the average person? Or is the difference between "fewer" and "less" just too hard to learn?
I have fewer and fewer ideas about it and less and less time to try to figure it out. Or is that less and less ideas about it and fewer and fewer time to try to figure it out? Nahhh... it's the first one, don't you agree?
1 comment:
I blame the supermarkets. All this business about "10 items or less."
It may, arguably, mean ten items or none at all, but I think the only correct course is to ask for an explanation -- especially when the store is busy.
Post a Comment